Task 4 : Arguments for the adoption of scrum and against

 

Arguments for the adoption of scrum 

 

It is flexible and adaptable. Scrum is appropriate for a wide range of locations and circumstances that necessitate a flexible approach and don't initially have clearly defined criteria.

It promotes original thinking. Creativity is fostered and new ideas are likely to emerge when Scrum teams collaborate and evaluate ideas from all of their members.

It is inexpensive: As the Scrum approach typically involves less paperwork and management, it can be cost-effective for a firm.

 

Indeed Team published 8 June 2021 said "It typically results in higher-quality work. Everyone on the team should take complete ownership of their work in order to foster a productive environment that produces products of the highest caliber."

 

Arguments against for the adoption of scrum 

 

It calls for a lot of training. The Scrum methodology might potentially produce speedy and high-quality outcomes, but its proper implementation necessitates a trained and skilled team. For the project to be a success, everyone on the team must comprehend the advantages and specifics of Scrum before committing to it.

It can be challenging to scale. It might be difficult to apply the Scrum methodology to major projects because doing so calls for intensive training and careful planning. Although there are approaches to scaling Scrum to larger projects, they are typically challenging to comprehend and use.

It might necessitate significant organizational changes.

 

Mike Beedle 2001 may 18 said "Experienced individuals are needed. The Scrum technique requires extended periods of intense work, and everyone participating needs the knowledge and expertise to complete their own jobs swiftly and effectively. Each team member must be able to execute and give informed input on the outcomes and overall process."